More Than 770,000 Children Are No Longer Receiving SNAP Benefits After Trump Changes Federal Food Program
Republican backers of Trump’s signature domestic policy bill repeatedly claimed that revisions to the food benefits program wouldn’t affect the most vulnerable. But reports from a dozen states show children are losing access.
As a House committee debated President Donald Trump’s signature domestic policy bill last year, Republican backers repeatedly emphasized that its changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, wouldn’t affect vulnerable people.
SNAP reforms would “restore integrity” to the program and ensure it works for the “most vulnerable among us, including children,” said Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican and chair of the House Agriculture Committee.
Passing the bill would be a “historic accomplishment” that will ensure “those in need can continue to receive the assistance they need,” said Rep. John Rose, a Republican from Tennessee.
And Rep. Dusty Johnson, a South Dakota Republican, said the bill would focus resources on the “neediest” Americans. “If you are a pregnant woman, your benefits are unaffected. If you have young children at home, your benefits are unaffected by this bill. If you are disabled, your benefits are unaffected by this bill.”
But nearly a year after the measure was signed into law, the number of children receiving food assistance has plummeted by at least 776,000, according to a ProPublica analysis. At least 12 states break down program participation by age, and of the 1,670,011 people who are no longer receiving benefits in those states, 776,134, or 46%, were children.
Another analysis reached the same conclusion: Just last month, the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found there were 700,000 fewer children receiving food assistance.
Arizona has seen the nation’s largest percentage decline in SNAP participants; 205,223 children are no longer receiving the benefit since July 2025, a 55% drop. Louisiana had the second largest percent decline among children, 22%.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees SNAP, hasn’t detailed the impact on children aided by the program, but initial figures show that compared to February 2025, 4.3 million fewer people received SNAP nationwide in February 2026, leaving 37.8 million participants.
Although children weren’t the intended targets of the legislation’s changes, they’re increasingly “collateral damage,” said Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
If states are trying to comply with the law’s changes to SNAP, they’re likely not focusing on making the program accessible, Bergh said. Other experts said that people may be pushed off the program because of increased paperwork requirements to remain eligible.
States are required to impose work requirements for most adult recipients, while preparing for two major cost shifts. In October, states will begin covering 75% of the program’s administrative costs. States have been paying 50% of those costs.
In addition, states will have to pay a larger share of SNAP benefits starting in October 2027, based on their error rate. Error rates reflect overpayments or underpayments of SNAP benefits. While sometimes characterized as fraud, such errors are usually the fault of the state agency or the SNAP recipient, according to USDA, which describes them as “largely unintentional.”
If a state agency is facing staffing shortages and struggling to comply with new regulations, it will be harder for low-income families to access the benefits, Bergh said. “Families are falling through the cracks.”
In Massachusetts, for example, the share of SNAP applicants who called an assistance line and couldn’t reach a worker rose from 61% in November to nearly 81% in March, according to the Department of Transitional Assistance, which administers SNAP in the state. The state agency did not respond to a request for comment.
A USDA spokesperson did not address ProPublica’s questions about the number of children who have lost access to SNAP. “There is no shortage of resources for the most vulnerable among us, including children,” the spokesperson said.
Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDirivs 4.0
Have you lost your benefits? Are you working with those who have? Help ProPublica do more reporting. We need your help understanding what shifting policies actually mean for communities across the country. If your SNAP or Medicaid benefits have been cut or if you work to help people navigate public assistance programs, you can email us at safetynet@propublica.org to share your experience.
Breaking With Trump, or Just His Poll Numbers?
Candidates show some dissent over the Iran war, as Grassley and Ernst vote against limiting Trump’s war powersIowa Republican candidates are changing their positions on the Iran war as Election Day approaches. That is news. Calling it a “break with Trump” may be...
Has the UI Center Lost Its Academic Legitimacy?
How Much Academic Legitimacy Does Iowa's Center for Intellectual Freedom Have Left?Eleven scholars recruited to help establish the Center have resigned. Their departure raises a bigger question about what made this politically created institution academic in the first...
Trump Lost His Lawsuit. But Did the Lawsuit Fail?
An Iowa judge threw out Donald Trump’s lawsuit against Gannett and pollster J. Ann Selzer. But after nearly two years of litigation, the case raises a larger question about what it means to “win.”President Donald Trump lost his lawsuit against Gannett (owner of the...
As Iowans Suffer, Grassley Turns His Focus to Transgender Sports
Iowa already prohibits transgender girls from competing in girls' sports. With farmers struggling with diesel prices and families confronting inflation and housing costs, why is Chuck Grassley making the issue a national priority now?Should we be concerned about his...
Would a Ban of Diesel Exports Actually Lower Prices? Likely Not.
It’s More Complicated Than Grassley BelievesSen. Chuck Grassley says the U.S. should stop exporting diesel to bring down prices for farmers and truckers. The oil industry says that could backfire. Its explanation deserves a closer look.Iowa farmers are heading into...
Iowa Corn Growers Ask for Diesel Price Relief as Harvest Begins
Iowa Corn Growers Association asks for diesel relief as harvest kicks offBy Cami KoonsIowa Capital Dispatch As Iowa farmers begin harvesting their crops, corn growers in the state are asking Iowa congressional delegates to help lower the cost of diesel fuel, which has...
Mortgage Rates Hit 7% as War Increases Housing Market Pressure
Higher energy prices, persistent inflation, and rising borrowing costs are making an already difficult housing market even harder for buyers.The New York Times reports that mortgage rates have climbed above 7% for the first time since January 2025, another economic...
